Overachievers of past generations seemed to aim straight for the top – seemingly to presume that if you could get to the top that you should. Alas, I believe GenX has created a new breed – the ambivalent overachiever. This breed is not so obsessed with whether they can get to the top, but whether they want to. There is a sense that such ambivalence would not be so appreciated by the powers that be, so most ambivalent overachievers are out there masquerading as “normal” dedicated employees. They are indeed often quite successful, as GenXers tend to be rather perceptive about how to play the game (if they choose to play it).
The overachievement part is motivated by a variety of factors. First and foremost – success gives you options. And every GenX knows that options are power. Overachievement probably means you can walk out the door, if things are not working out. Very important even if you are actually quite happy with your current employment.
Of course, ambivalent or not, many of us overachieve simply because we actually care about what we are doing. Even if it not our dream job (our Plan F), there is some meaning to be gained from just doing something well, to doing your best. Part of this is not just about what we are doing, but who we are doing it for. Though GenXers are notoriously cynical about organizations, we can still be inspired by and loyal to people ~ whether those people are clients, coworkers, or “the boss.”
The question is, can this breed become the next generation of leaders? Can leadership and ambivalence coexist? It seems that the GenX habit of having one foot subconsciously out the door may be incompatible with leadership. Or maybe it is just going to change the way leadership looks and feels. The question is, can you be an effective leader in an organization without drinking the kool-aid? What do you think?